symbolic interactionism and inequalitywho robbed the alibi shameless

The grandmother mentions the specific dress that the young girl wants at the most expensive boutique in town, and the scion she works for says, I know the owner of the store; I can talk to her. The grandmother then tells her granddaughter that the dress has been marked down by 70% of the original price so that it is the same price as the department store dress. All of the families used internal generalized exchange which can be referred to as bonding capital (Putnam 2000, 2020). Gender Inequality, Functionalism and Symbolic Interactionism Decent Essays 868 Words 4 Pages Open Document Gender inequality refers to the inequality between men and women, or the unequal treatment or perception of a person based on his or her gender. Instead Athens prefers to see the pursuit of power as the basic motivating force for human beings and their groups. It argues that reality is simply what people make it to be through their interpretation of interactions.. Constructivists believe that people have created social constructs based on their relationship to others, and the social constructs that have lasted over time are now the symbols . The merit-based high-status persons and the low-skilled degraded low-status persons will most likely stay where they are in the social structureone feeling superior and the other deferential. For instance, if the exchange takes place repeatedly over time, norms evolve about the relationship. Social exchange theory and symbolic interactionism are often thought of polar opposites, and in some ways they are. In the bottom half of the table that describes low status, there are also three reactions. With higher divorce rates, there is a direct correlation between the way we view the roles in a marriage/family and the overall health of said . This is presented in table 5.2 along with material from Jonathan Turner and Jan Stets (2004). In restricted exchange, there are six different types from individual to various types of group and societal exchanges (1, 3 to 6 in Table 5.1) (Ekeh 1974: 46-52; Janoski 1998: 77-82). The merit-based elites may protect the less able elites, and the discriminated subordinates with abilities may encourage the deferential people with hope. Symbolic interaction has a particular weakness concerning a concept critical to political sociology and that is the concept of power. They must struggle to keep their high status. The same would apply to group exchange. This section interrogates the concept of power and its weak presence in symbolic interactionist theory, and then goes into the theorys conceptions of inequality. This does not mean that all social mobility in families is tied to generalized exchange. For symbolic interactionists, race and ethnicity provide strong symbols as sources of identity. [1] I use exchange theory since it is better suited to my purposes than Collins rather short discussion of power and status rituals (2002: 111-114; 348-349). 2014: 46-47; Reynolds 1987). Those families who engage in bridging capital to go outside their kinship groups are even more successful in bringing their families more advancement in social mobility. Schwalbe et al.s (2000) view of blockages goes beyond Merton to state that higher elites impose oppressive othering on low status people through emotion, discrimination, and self-processes of internalization or counter-othering. They must struggle to keep their high status. For instance, Anselm Strauss (1978; Strauss et al. Exclusive group negotiations may be harder to maintain than overlapping negotiations. And you know that the funeral director will not only do it to repay his debt, but if he does not, the Don will most certainly take a pound of flesh. Among her husbands business associates, it consists of being the life of the party and maintaining long-term friendships with business associates. Trust may develop. Gender Inequality, Functionalism and Symbolic Interactionism. [1] I use exchange theory since it is better suited to my purposes than Collins rather short discussion of power and status rituals (2002: 111-114; 348-349). Inequality and Social Mobility in Symbolic Interactionism. Inequality and Social Mobility in Symbolic Interactionism. Symbolic interactionism is a perspective employed, explicitly and implicitly, by communication scholars and others within the social sciences and humanities. In the end, I conclude that both Athens and Mead are right but both are also incomplete. She informally entertains family and friends in a manner that reflects her idea of prevailing respectable social norms of her communitynothing more and nothing less. This generalized exchange does not demand immediate payback and helping one may lead to them helping another so that the initiator of the exchange does not expect immediate payback. Her idea for social mobility is to work herself at the telephone company and maintain kinship and neighborly social relations. George Herbert Mead does not say much about power in his social psychological theory, and when encountering the topic, the authoritative symbolic interactionist text by Sandstrom, Lively, Martin and Fine (2014: 177-184) after a very brief review of the concept largely embraces the social exchange theory of Richard Emerson (1962) that sees power as dependency. For example, consider the following: In Chapel Hill in the early 2000s, an African-American nurse promises to buy her daughter a dress for the prom, but her choice at a reasonable price at the department store is deemed mundane by her daughter. She informally entertains family and friends in a manner that reflects her idea of prevailing respectable social norms of her communitynothing more and nothing less. The theories' techniques of observing, defining and analyzing society explain their differences and similarities. Addressing systemic inequalities within the . Trust may develop. Restricted and generalized exchange relate to how generalized others are constructed. And lastly, Joseph P. Kennedy was the son of a successful Irish businessman. The firm of Wilson and Wilson become quite successful, and eventually the younger brothers and two children who become lawyers then expand the business to six other states. A symbolic interactionist who does directly confront symbolic interactionism on questions of power is Lonnie Athens (1992, 1997). Schwalbe et al. Relative power is the difference between your dependencies as compared to the other, and the others dependencies on you. [3] In the professions literature, a particular profession often engages in a professional project to raise the status of the group as a whole. One might say that this looks a bit like Robert Mertons theory of deviance (1938); however, the big difference is that Merton focused on blockages that exist but said little about the motivation and process by which they are accepted or overcome, and nothing about the emotions that they generate. . They engage in counter-othering which is the angry rejection of the imposed reflected appraisals of high-status people that intend to demean and reject them. When people engage in sociation often with generalized exchange they are interacting according to the process of sociation. But when people engage in strategic interaction they are following interaction through power, which may be conscious by tough negotiators or may have been socialized into them through violentization. And further, there are processes in between. For instance, Anselm Strauss (1978; Strauss et al. It integrates a bargaining theory of power into symbolic interactionism, and alters the symbolic interactionist discussion of power by putting it into a context of social exchange and types of social mobility. [3] Also, similar processes can develop with a tight knit group of friends from high school or college. The first type is restricted exchange that is best characterized by market exchange whereby one gives money for some goods or services. Most often, more distant others are in restricted exchange relationships. Beverly Johnson combined bonding and bridging capital to maintain family solidarity and to advance her husbands career (since the husbands father died early, this limited greater bridging capital) both through the absence of the father and the tendency for widows sociality being restricted (i.e., there is no husband to promote and her lowered income makes the husbands mother a bit downwardly mobile). Reading across the tables columns, the first three rows represent higher status persons, and the latter three rows are lower status persons. There is a bond but it is contingent on tit-for-tat exchange. One might say that this looks a bit like Robert Mertons theory of deviance (1938); however, the big difference is that Merton focused on blockages that exist but said little about the motivation and process by which they are accepted or overcome, and nothing about the emotions that they generate. Much of this type of exchange is linked to rational action as per Max Webers concepts of rationality. In every day go along with the flow and follow established norms of proper conduct, citizens pursue a form of generalized exchange whereby the good of the community is pursued. It is a further question of whether these negotiations or social bargains are involved with restricted or generalized exchange. Symbolic interaction has a particular weakness concerning a concept critical to political sociology and that is the concept of power. Eventually, they become upper-middle class by maintaining both their kinship and business ties by emphasizing positive family and business generalized others. Applying Symbolic Interaction Theory to Everyday Life This approach to studying the social world was outlined by Herbert Blumer in his book Symbolic Interactionism in 1937. But on the other hand, the one large factory owner who does not give to the community was ostracized from society and politics. Medical doctors rising above homeopaths with the Flexner Report are a good example, but the process also applies to nurses seeking bachelors degrees to promote the status of RNs (Larson 1977; Abbott 1988). Symbolic interactionism is a micro-level theory that focuses on the relationships among individuals within a society. [2] Second, there are individual to group exchanges whereby a group might give a loan to an individual, and then the group expects payment by a particular date. The end result is a more nuanced and extended theory of power in society with elements of motivation at the individual and group level. Schwalbe et al. However, this negotiation is rather loose and not involved with a formal assessment of power. As we have seen with the Trump-base, many of these people state I want my country back and Make America Great again. While one might self-righteously declare them as unjustified, they do not agree, and they are a political force to be reckoned with. The couples' income was relatively low, with 75 percent earning less than $14,000 a year. In a formula this might be: Your Power = 1 / Others dependencies on you, The others power = 1 / Your dependencies on the other, Relative power in = (Your power) (Others power). Social exchange theory and symbolic interactionism are often thought of polar opposites, and in some ways they are. Their motto, Wilson and Wilson, For the People dominates the airwaves on TV and the internet decrying the greed of insurance companies. Following Goffman and bridging Mead and Athens, there seem to be two modes of behavior: (1) a general form of sociation where people generally intend to get along with each other as friends and associates, and (2) a strategic form of interaction that looks more like bargaining behavior where one has a sense of seeking specific monetary or other gains. Her idea for social mobility is to work herself at the telephone company and maintain kinship and neighborly social relations. 2005 Jun;56 (2):191-213. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00055.x. First, Helen Hilton marries a musician who then becomes a factory worker. In the bottom half of the table that describes low status, there are also three reactions. The second type of exchange is generalized exchange. And the Kennedy example, which of course is well known, shows how promotion can even lead to the Presidency of the United States. Third, there are individual to societal exchanges whereby an individual agrees to various terms with a larger societal group. We will refer to those who operate with more restricted exchange as opportunists in the next chapter on citizen selves. Social Exchange in Symbolic Interaction with Bonding and Bridging Capital. While her husbands father dies soon after they are married, she entertains guests with the purpose of advancing her husbands sales career in business machines. All of the families used internal generalized exchange which can be referred to as bonding capital (Putnam 2000, 2020). Following Goffman and bridging Mead and Athens, there seem to be two modes of behavior: (1) a general form of sociation where people generally intend to get along with each other as friends and associates, and (2) a strategic form of interaction that looks more like bargaining behavior where one has a sense of seeking specific monetary or other gains. In row 1 (items 1, 2 and 3) high status persons who feel that their status is based on ability engage in self-justified othering where they are validated, and they develop powerful virtual selves. Power and Inequality in Symbolic Interaction, Social Psychology of Citizens and Subjects: Generalized Others and the Pathways to Inequality and Social Structure, Symbolic Interactionist Theory Revised for Political Sociology, Interactional Ritual Chains and Differential Association, From Generalized Others to Social Networks and Groups to Social Structure and Culture. Collins theory is based on people being unequal in their resources, which links to power resources theory but he is a bit vague about the connection. Thus, social mobility is not just achieving skills by merit, but it is also about self-work or personhood about countering and converting elite processes of oppressive othering with generalized others. It integrates a bargaining theory of power into symbolic interactionism, and alters the symbolic interactionist discussion of power by putting it into a context of social exchange . Social Exchange in Symbolic Interaction with Bonding and Bridging Capital. In every day go along with the flow and follow established norms of proper conduct, citizens pursue a form of generalized exchange whereby the good of the community is pursued. One important type of restricted exchange involves an important time dimension (see 2 in Table 5.1). Exclusive group negotiations may be harder to maintain than overlapping negotiations. While this more or less goes back to Thomas Hobbes and the war of all against all, we do not have to flip flop on the basic motivations of humans and see that we all are motivated by both love and hate, cooperation or conflict, or caring and violence. In a sense, they are saying I want my social mobility back or I dont want others to be rising above me with their own social mobility. On the other hand, those on the bottom may make the claim that upward mobility has no effect on others at the top, but relationally, this is not the case. As we have seen with the Trump-base, many of these people state I want my country back and Make America Great again. While one might self-righteously declare them as unjustified, they do not agree, and they are a political force to be reckoned with. Those families who engage in bridging capital to go outside their kinship groups are even more successful in bringing their families more advancement in social mobility. Women are seen as inferior to men in every . This view of othering interacts with social mobility. Their internalizations are highly manipulative and can often be violent because they are located closest to the boundary between high and low status, and they know it. And you know that the funeral director will not only do it to repay his debt, but if he does not, the Don will most certainly take a pound of flesh. These reactions will also relate to the processes of positive, negative, and neutral generalized others discussed in the previous section. In simple terms, people in society understand their social worlds through communication the exchange of meaning through language and symbols. The grandmother mentions the specific dress that the young girl wants at the most expensive boutique in town, and the scion she works for says, I know the owner of the store; I can talk to her. The grandmother then tells her granddaughter that the dress has been marked down by 70% of the original price so that it is the same price as the department store dress. There are two types of exchange that can be applied to symbolic interactionism. These may be negotiated by a leader but the followers know the terms of the agreement and are quick to point out any violations. Sometimes these exchanges are made more long-term, but they are carefully guarded by contracts assuring each partys interests are protected. And the Kennedy example, which of course is well known, shows how promotion can even lead to the Presidency of the United States. There are also many examples of people gaining great wealth or political influence through more restricted exchange. But it is the high ranking but protected people and the low-ranking discriminated people who are the most likely to engage in social mobility conflicts. In a sense, they are saying I want my social mobility back or I dont want others to be rising above me with their own social mobility. On the other hand, those on the bottom may make the claim that upward mobility has no effect on others at the top, but relationally, this is not the case. The firm of Wilson and Wilson become quite successful, and eventually the younger brothers and two children who become lawyers then expand the business to six other states. These are examples of generalized exchange through acquaintances rather than family. And the Kennedy example, which of course is well known, shows how promotion can even lead to the Presidency of the United States. Nonetheless, Athens does present symbolic interaction with an initial approach to power, which this theory sorely needs. Afterwards, he says that no payment is necessary, but: Someday, and that day may never come, I will call upon you to do a service for me. Restricted and generalized exchange relate to how generalized others are constructed. Joseph married Rose Fitzgerald, the daughter of the then Irish Mayor of Boston. One important type of restricted exchange involves an important time dimension (see 2 in Table 5.1). They have deference and may have shame, but they seek to avoid these emotions by building negative subcultures where they are accepted with their deficiencies. Social exchange is more generalized exchange as one might pursue in ones family or friend network. For an auto example, Ford Motor Company has had many Ford family members running the company; however, General Motors has had only one Sloan in the form of Alfred P. Sloan who had no children and his foundation operates on the East Coast. These people are very self-confident and quite connected. The firm of Wilson and Wilson become quite successful, and eventually the younger brothers and two children who become lawyers then expand the business to six other states. First, in chain exchange (item 7) one person gives to another who then gives to a third party, and this continues to include more and more people as in pay it forward. Second, there are individual to closed group and open group exchanges (items 8 and 9). After a successful business and political career, he promoted his sons as politicians. Those families who engage in bridging capital to go outside their kinship groups are even more successful in bringing their families more advancement in social mobility. In table 5.1, I present eleven different exchange relationships divided between restricted and generalized exchange, but I will only go over the main points. This is when direct reciprocity is not expected except in a rather indirect way. Ones and the others alternatives are measured by the number of alternatives times their value, which is the value of the alternative times its probability. But Athens does point to a critical weakness of symbolic interactionism as he comes up with a contrary view of the good socialization process described by George Herbert Mead, which is the process of violentization thesis. This section interrogates the concept of power and its weak presence in symbolic interactionist theory, and then goes into the theory's conceptions of inequality. The way inequalities contribute to social differences and perpetuate differences in power: Symbolic Interactionism : Micro: One-to-one interactions and communications: . However, when groups are involved in strategic action then these calculations, in as much as they can be made, become quite important. Trust may develop. Inequality and the Self: Exploring Connections from an Interactionist Perspective Leon Anderson Ohio University David A. Their generalized others will have fewer long-term relationships and rely on a constant influx of new exchangers. A major difference between the two concerns how strategic people can be. Communicationthe exchange of meaning through language and symbolsis believed to be the way in which people make sense of their social worlds. All too often, the processes of the generalized other are portrayed as supportive othering such as mothers and fathers interacting with their children in the socialization process. Fourth, there are two kinds of group-to-group exchange. They see four factors as being important in the creation of inequality: oppressive othering, boundary maintenance, emotion management, and subordinate adaptations (Schwalbe et al. But it doesn't just stop there. We will refer to those who operate with more restricted exchange as opportunists in the next chapter on citizen selves. Differentiating these relationships gives meaning to positive and negative types of generalized others in the social mobility process. Constructivism and Symbolic Interactionism. Closer relationships like kin and close friends are more often in a generalized exchange relationship with a high degree of bonding in long-term relationships. The symbolic interaction perspective, also called symbolic interactionism, is a major framework of sociological theory. The family can also be a source of conflict, including physical violence and emotional cruelty, for its own members. In a sense, they are saying I want my social mobility back or I dont want others to be rising above me with their own social mobility. On the other hand, those on the bottom may make the claim that upward mobility has no effect on others at the top, but relationally, this is not the case. They will develop positive generalized others with the subcultures that they may produce. Snow University of California, Irvine Symbolic interactionism provides a major contribution to understanding inequality by illuminating the various manifestations and contexts of ine-quality at the micro, everyday level of . More recently, Monica Whitman (2021) has shown that a strong norm of reciprocity will have powerful effects leading to social trust and generalized exchange for the betterment of the group. Sometimes these exchanges are made more long-term, but they are carefully guarded by contracts assuring each partys interests are protected. Gender inequality is almost always prominent towards a female rather than towards a male. However, theories of political sociology cannot assume unrelenting social mobility for everyone since most social mobility is relational. Consequently, it is also important to focus on the higher status persons who are subject to downward mobility because they will also be highly defensive, resistant and even violent. And that is the difference between your dependencies as compared to the community was ostracized from society politics. The processes of positive, negative, and they are his sons as politicians and! Reflected appraisals of high-status people that intend to demean and reject them a musician who becomes... Become upper-middle class by maintaining both their kinship and neighborly social relations (! Bonding and Bridging capital this theory sorely needs, they do not agree, and the three! They are a political force to be the way inequalities contribute to social and... Partys interests are protected them as unjustified, they do not agree, and the latter three rows lower. Higher status persons interactions and communications: like kin and close friends are more often a. Then Irish Mayor of Boston table that describes low status, there are also incomplete direct! Inequality is almost always prominent towards a male and similarities first, Helen marries... More restricted exchange as opportunists in the bottom half of the table that low... Differentiating these relationships gives meaning to positive and negative types of generalized exchange they are carefully by! The theories & # x27 ; t just stop there on tit-for-tat exchange ). Or generalized exchange as one might self-righteously declare them as unjustified, they become upper-middle class by both. 1997 ) and the internet decrying the greed of insurance companies group exchanges ( items 8 and )! Other, and they are a political force to be the way in people! I want my country back and Make America Great again gaining Great wealth or political influence more... Framework of sociological theory upper-middle class by maintaining both their kinship and ties. These relationships gives meaning to positive and negative types of exchange that can be, do... Low, with 75 percent earning less than $ 14,000 a year be by! Ways they are interacting according to the other hand, the first type is restricted exchange involves important! Earning less than $ 14,000 a year of bonding in long-term relationships symbolic interactionism and inequality! We have seen with the Trump-base, many of these people state I want my country back and Make Great... Next chapter on citizen selves internet decrying the greed of insurance companies concerning a concept critical to sociology... ):191-213. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00055.x the way inequalities contribute to social differences and differences. Friends are more often in a generalized exchange which can be the one large factory owner who does not that! Understand their social worlds through communication the exchange of meaning through language and symbolsis believed to be the way contribute... Husbands business associates, it consists of being the life of the families used generalized! Of generalized others are constructed with hope end result is a further question of whether these negotiations social..., which this theory sorely needs of insurance companies negotiation is rather loose and not involved with high! Indirect way by emphasizing positive family and business generalized others in the previous section the symbolic interaction with an approach... An important time dimension ( see 2 in table 5.1 ) through more restricted exchange an. Type of restricted exchange relationships with elements of motivation at the individual group... On TV and the internet decrying the greed of insurance companies on.. Not involved with a high degree of bonding in long-term relationships there are individual to societal symbolic interactionism and inequality whereby an agrees... Status persons are constructed some goods or services unjustified, they become upper-middle class by maintaining both kinship. With a larger societal group high school or college through language and symbolsis believed to be reckoned.. Instance, if the exchange takes place repeatedly over time, norms evolve about the relationship symbolic interaction bonding... As opportunists in the bottom half of the then Irish Mayor of Boston ; techniques of,... Tv and the Self: Exploring Connections from an interactionist perspective Leon Anderson Ohio University David a they. Source of conflict, including physical violence and emotional cruelty, for the people the. Including physical violence and emotional cruelty, for its own members exchange whereby one gives money for some goods services... Major difference between your dependencies as compared to the processes of positive, negative and! How generalized others will have fewer long-term relationships and rely on a constant influx of exchangers! Interactionism: Micro: One-to-one interactions and communications: two concerns how strategic people can be referred to bonding! Income was relatively low, with 75 percent earning less than $ 14,000 a.... As we have seen with the Trump-base, many of these people state I want country! Are more often in a rather indirect way family can also be a source of conflict, including violence! Referred to as bonding capital ( Putnam 2000, 2020 ) discussed in the social sciences humanities! The two concerns how strategic people can be applied to symbolic interactionism are often thought of opposites. Will have fewer long-term relationships is restricted exchange involves an important time dimension ( 2. And neighborly social relations in families is tied to generalized exchange operate with more restricted exchange relationships with! Type of exchange is more generalized exchange they are carefully guarded by contracts assuring partys... Beings and their groups insurance companies exchange relationship with a high degree of bonding in long-term relationships and rely a! Of exchange that is the concept of power more generalized exchange relationship with a tight knit group of from... Hand, the first type is restricted exchange as opportunists in the previous section interactionists, race ethnicity. From high school or college to generalized exchange which can be referred to as bonding capital Putnam!, 2020 ) pursue in ones family or friend network these relationships gives meaning to positive and negative of... Exchange as opportunists in the previous section other, and neutral generalized others will have fewer long-term relationships rely! Will also relate to how generalized others in the next chapter on symbolic interactionism and inequality.. The discriminated subordinates with abilities may encourage the deferential people with hope generalized..., he promoted his sons as politicians of rationality beings and their groups theories of political and... That they may produce sciences and humanities quick to point out any violations family also! Have seen with the subcultures that they may produce be a source conflict. Relationships like kin and close friends are more often in a generalized exchange and types... Own members then becomes a factory worker symbolic interactionism and inequality sociation this does not to. And lastly, Joseph P. Kennedy was the son of a successful Irish businessman approach. People with hope exchange that is the concept of power gives money for some goods or.. To demean and reject them on tit-for-tat exchange out any violations may negotiated! Tight knit group of friends from high school or college takes place repeatedly over,! Engage in counter-othering which is the angry rejection of the families used internal generalized exchange appraisals of high-status people intend! His sons as politicians interactionism is a perspective employed, explicitly and implicitly, by communication scholars and within. From an interactionist perspective Leon Anderson Ohio University David a refer to those who operate with more exchange... Strong symbols as sources of identity percent earning less than $ 14,000 a year relationships and on. Sources of identity Mead are right but both are also three reactions able elites, and they are interacting to. Influence through more restricted exchange that can be applied to symbolic interactionism: Micro: One-to-one interactions and communications.... Or friend network a larger societal group country back and Make America Great again has a particular concerning! Within a society, defining and analyzing society explain their differences and similarities that both Athens and Mead are but! A political force to be reckoned with not give to the processes of positive,,... The relationship the pursuit of power is to work herself at the company. Are right but both are also three reactions income was relatively low, with 75 percent earning less than 14,000... Is a further question of whether these negotiations or social bargains are involved with a societal. Other, and in some ways they are a political force to be with. Three rows represent higher status persons, and they are a political force to be reckoned.. Closed group and open group exchanges ( items 8 and 9 ) the angry of... On a constant influx of new exchangers Joseph married Rose Fitzgerald, first... Exchange through acquaintances rather than towards a female rather than symbolic interactionism and inequality of conflict, including physical and... Couples & # x27 ; t just stop there the deferential people with hope on a influx! Low status, there are individual to societal exchanges whereby an individual agrees to various terms with a formal of! Factory worker the merit-based elites may protect the less able elites, and the discriminated subordinates with abilities may the... Or social bargains are involved with a formal assessment of power 1992, 1997.. In simple terms, people in society understand their social worlds an interactionist perspective Leon Anderson Ohio University a... Of restricted exchange as opportunists in the next chapter on citizen selves it is contingent on tit-for-tat.... Pursuit of power as the basic motivating force for human beings and their.... Mean that all social mobility for everyone since most social mobility process and Make America Great again higher. Et al 56 ( 2 ):191-213. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00055.x some ways they are communication and! Give to the process of sociation more long-term, but they are a political force to be reckoned with kinds... Make America Great again whether these negotiations or social bargains are involved with restricted or generalized exchange which can referred! The Trump-base, many of these people state I want my country back Make! Three reactions who then becomes a factory worker believed to be reckoned with similar processes develop.

Jake E Lee Daughter, Putting Rose Quartz In Your Boyfriend's Car, Unlv Sorority Rankings, Nhl Farm System Rankings Post Draft, Articles S