grumman tiger vs cessna 172amy gaither hayes wedding

Free shipping . This month we will compare the two aircraft the Flying Educators have operated in their 57, based at Ft. Lauderdale Executive Airport (KFXE), . The Tiger was the outcome of the same redesign work on the AA-5 Traveler that resulted in the 150 hp (110 kW) Cheetah and it was originally little more than the same aircraft with a Lycoming O-360-A4K 180 hp (130 kW) engine, resulting in a 139-knot (257 km/h) cruise speed. The specs list the cruise speed at 139 knots, but Greg said theFlying Educators usually fly ateconomy cruise and get 115ktsto 120ktsground speed whilethe180-hp Lycoming O360 burns 10 gph. The Citabria breed has an AD requiring a one-time inspection of the wooden spar where they have to check it for cracks. If you only want to fly solo, or with one other person, and dont want to carry too much luggage, then the Cessna 150 will be fine. I flew a Cessna 150 which was older than this for many years, and had no problems at all. While the difference between the two is by no means huge, the 152 is the more economical option. Owners of both these aircraft types usually like them a lot. Maintenance on the 115-hp version was relatively inexpensive, Greg said. The plane was always in a hangar probably a major factor.. So this might well decide things for you. I only have time in the AA1X series, the baby brother of the tiger, the canopy design I think is one of the better ones in GA, no issues, the free castor nose wheel was great for ground handling, nice shock absorbing and strong fiberglass mains, good fuel tank system, etc. At the end of the day, Greg noted that most members fly solo or with only one passenger and, for that reason, the airplane has to be fun to fly, and it is. But by arbitrarily painting the red line at 2650 rpm it is limited to 157 hp. Compared to strut-braced Cessnas, the Tiger and Cheetah are clean speedsters. In the year or two Greg was in the club while it operated the Citabria, there were no new members without prior tailwheel experience. Some smaller pilots struggle to fly the Cessna 172, while some large people find they have problems in the Cessna 150 Finding a good mechanic that has tube and fabric experience and expertise is important, and it could be a little more challenging to find than someone used to working on 172s or Cherokees. How do I Grumman American AA-5 Tiger In Action - YouTube This video features a Grumman American Aviation AA-5B Tiger seen flying around CZNL in Nelson, British Columbia. If you are also correspondingly heavy, you could also have an issue with weight and balance. Maintenance on the 115-hp version was relatively inexpensive, Greg s, The Flying Educators did routine maintenance and annuals in-house with little difficulty, Greg said. youll pay a premium based on your least experienced pilot. Discussion in 'Flight Following' started by BellyUpFish, Aug 29, 2011. Its very responsive. On the other hand, smaller people may struggle to fly the Cessna 172, particularly earlier models. The club did not have a named insured policy and the requirements were pretty standard. The nosewheel looks flimsy but I spoke to a former Grumman pilot that says they are quite sturdy. Bill & Carol Scott, who own the high-compression STC, don't have the resources to do the full testing and certification protocol themselves, so the modified Cheetah is artificially limited to 157 hp to conform to the original specs. Perhaps you are on a tight budget, are rather small and struggle to reach controls in some airplanes, or really dont want or need a four-seater aircraft. According to Greg, the 115-hpCitabria burned about 5 to 6 gph, making it economical to operate. But if safety is important to you, you might still find you prefer the Cessna 172. Cheetahs are faster than Tigers. In the AG-5B, the 12-volt electrical system was replaced with a 24-volt system, and the refresh included several minor systems and aerodynamic improvements, plus improved corrosion coating. get there? Small ruder for X wind landing, more than one landed on nose wheel and met their demise not that other aircraft don't. Before I bought my Grumman Tiger, I was in a flying club and flew a Cessna Cardinal. The bonded fuselage construction makes for a slippery, efficient airframe. The plane cruised at around 115 mph and had about a 20-gallon fuel tank, Greg recalled. Since four passenger capability andcross-country speeds werent a part of the mission, the Citabria was a perfect choice.. Archer is also a nice plane, although it doesn't feel as sporty as the Tiger. With full fuel, the payload is about 500 pounds or so plenty if its two people flying with luggage. Editorial Team Cessna 172 Skyhawk. This is at least the third Tiger thread in two days. It is so small that some large students who want to learn to fly in it just cannot manage it, and have no choice but to use the more spacious Cessna 172. Does he have it on Barnstormers, Trade a Plane etc. Theyre fast little airplanes.. Mojogrip online https://mojogrip.net Add me on Instagram https://goo.gl/U7Fcca Add me on Facebook https://goo.gl/rbjE6N Back with the second half of Krish's . The Cessna 172 is a lot more powerful than the Cessna 150. Enter your email and click on the I am a , The specs list the cruise speed at 139 knots, but Greg said the. Tiger owners report cruise speeds of 125 to 133 knots at 8.5 to 10 gallons per hour, while owners with 160 hp Cheetahs fly about 10 knots slower with a slightly lower fuel burn. The AA-5B came back to life as the AG-5B from 1990 to 1993 and again from 2001 to 2006. With a fixed-pitch propeller and fixed gear, it is simple to operate. The four-place Grumman AA-5 family might be one of the better-kept secrets, offering the simplicity of a Cessna 172 while approaching the cruise speed of a similarly powered Mooney. They're fairly benign in a stall and quite a challenge to get to spin (though this isn't impossible). Also See: Cessna 150 vs 172; Cessna 180 vs 185 Your login, avatars, posts and archives have all be relocated there. 1. This effectively provides Tiger speed and climb performance at the price closer to that of a Cheetah. If you had a Tiger without the autopilot, its not going to be quite as stable as a 172 or a 182. Its nimble in the air, seats four, and has a good cruising speed with minimal fuel burn. The main parts supplier for Grumman aircraft is an outfit called Fletch Air, and I think theyre based in Houston, he said. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. I don't know the details of his financial situation, but I think he could pop for a Tiger without breaking a sweat. Flying Educators have never had a problem getting insurance for the Tiger. Prices for the mid-70s Tigers range from $30,000 for a VFR-equipped aircraft with an engine nearing TBO to about $60,000 for a better-equipped model. Many pilots are likely to have learned to fly on one or other of them, and even more will have flown them soon after getting their Private Pilots License. The Cheetah may give marginal climb performance at high density altitudes. I toured all of Europe in one of these, with a friend. Accordingly, a good, reliable engine-monitoring system is a wise investment, and with the proper adapter, savvy buyers can download engine-monitor data to observe how a seller has been treating the engine. The club did not have a named insured policy and the requirements were pretty standard. They charge $90 an hour wet. Indeed, unlike most comparable aircraft, there are no moving parts inside of an AA-5s wingall flap and aileron actuation is achieved via easily accessible torque tubes upon which each control surface pivots. "Three or four of the 10 members would use it for aerobatics a lot. Greg said. 3 sections "glued" together sliding on to some sort of flagpole structure. The 172 is a simple plane to fly and has been used for decades as one of the most common primary trainers. Please contact the friendly folks at the Pilots Place for Between 4,000 feet and 10,000 feet, depending on temperature, it gets between 8.3 gph to 9.2 gph. Am I safe to buy a Cheetah, get IFR and build 200 hours then sell -- or will I get bored before then and wish I would have waited for a Tiger? 1. The Cessna 172 Skyhawk is an American four-seat, single-engine, high wing, fixed-wing aircraft made by the Cessna Aircraft Company. Insurance premiums went from over $3,000 in 2002 to over $6,000 in 2010. Are the LoPresti Tiger cowls in production yet? The manufacturing history of the AA-5 series is a colorful one. And a little more economically.. Grumman Tiger Vs Cessna 150 - YouTube Grumman Tiger over taking Cessna 150 at + 50 kts. In the early 90s up to the when the Flying Educators sold the Citabria in 1995, the hourly rate was $21 wet, and the monthly club dues were $42. It will keep up with a 182. They are both basically a means to make aerial journeys, designed for touring or simply pleasure flying. New and experienced pilots alike enjoy Grummans fiberglass main gear, describing it as robust and forgiving. Seriously, the acquisition cost is the least of his worries. The Citabria wins this category over the Tiger without question. Gross weight was increased from the AA-5/AA-5A's 2,200 lb (1,000 kg) to 2,400 lb (1,100 kg) on the Tiger. Both of them fly relatively slowly, and they are not suitable for activities such as aerobatics. I know better. 2. There are no STC's for putting a 160HP engine in an AA-5 Traveler, and I've never heard of such an installation. As with the AA-5A, the AA-5B was continued in production by Gulfstream when they purchased Grumman's American division. Ron, correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that with the modification the engine would (hypothetically) put out 160 hp at 2700 rpm. Bede designed the two-place BD-1 with an emphasis on speed and economy, and when it was purchased by American Aviation and developed into the AA-1 series, these qualities were carried over. Cheetahs are around 850lbs. I've never heard anyone say the sliding canopy leaks. The Main Differences Between the Piper Archer and Cessna 172. One letter called the new Cessna 172 "the rough technological and stylisticequivalent of a 1966 Chevy Novaat the price of two Mercedes." Another called the announced $124,500 base price of the new Skyhawk"incredible" and suggested that $75,000 or $80,000 would be appropriate. ). TheFlying Educators requires members to already have their Private Pilot Certificate, but Greg would recommend the aircraft as a primary trainer. https://thepilotsplace.com/contact.html. That was its strong suit.. Every Cessna 172 or Cherokee 140 I fly with is quickly left in the dust by a good 10 to 15 knots. So you should have no difficulty in finding one to buy, but it will of course be fairly old. , The main parts supplier for Grumman aircraft is an outfit called Fletch Air, and I think theyre based in Houston, he said. Former Flying Educators Club Secretary and Treasurer Greg Utley shares his thoughts on both aircraft. Helen has worked as an instructor for several years, flying throughout Europe and the US. The one disadvantage is that it is a little gross weight challenged, Greg said. Among the most valuable resources available to Grumman owners are the bustling owners groups. Nicest one Ive ever seen. Greg pointed out thefirst Tiger policy premium was $2,360 in 1996, which was slightly higher than the Citabria. One points out that there are fewer moving parts in an AA-5 than there are in a Cessna 150, and another enjoys how all flight control cables are neatly located in the center of the aircraft and are relatively short in length. AA-5 prices can vary widely, but when we exclude the most extreme examples in a recent sampling of listings, the majority fall in the $30,000 to $60,000 range. Despite the increase in cost, theFlying Educators have never had a problem getting insurance for the Tiger. Expect to pay between $50,000 - 100,000 for a 152, and $100,000 - 200,000 for a 172 in similar condition. you have to plan for fabric recovery and fabric repair. Krish discussed having to change some avionics, propeller, engine cowling, and after 300 hours of flying him and his partners also had to overhaul the 180hp engine, which cost a whopping $28,000. Copyright 2023 Aviator Insider | A Topsail Media Company | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme. This is definitely something you should consider whenever you decide to buy your own airplane. Enjoy!Aircraft: N474EPC172ROutro Song:Gold Skies - Liam Aidan They're thrifty to run, simple to maintain, light on the controls and have great visibility with their sliding canopies. Fuse to Circuit Breakers - Grumman Style: Replacing your old fuse holders with Klixon 7277-2 series circuit breakers. , which as you know is fully aerobatic, Greg said. 2. Visibility is amazing. With a power setting of 2550 rpm to 2600 rpm, Mike usually cruises between 135 and 138 knots. They are easy to fly, but speed control on final is critical or they will float, so maybe just a tad more discipline is needed, but they behave well, with no gotchas. The Tiger is halfway between a sport plane and a Cessna 172. The AA-5 series serves as an interesting alternative to the comparable Cessna and Piper models that make up the general aviation fleet. Canopy is great when taxiing in the summer and in the pattern. It s the same friendly, informative place for all things Cessna 172, now with a larger group of pilots and state-of-the-art forum software. Insurance companies are all familiar with both these aircraft, so their charges are likely to be reasonable. There is a reason why so many people fly the Cessna 172, and why it is said to be the most popular aircraft ever produced. They can provide anything for the airplanewheels, wheel pants, windshields, cowlings, anything you need for a Tiger or similar Grumman aircraftthey can provide.. Picture . If you fly a Tiger for 20 or 30 hours and get into a Cessna 172, it feels like a truck., You cant go wrong with either a Citabria or a Grumman Tiger in your club. Useful load on most of Tigers I've seen run in 900-950lb range. One operator I flew for we had a Traveller as a run around plane to gather guys in from remote strips (cheaper to fly it than the Ag planes if they need to be there tomorrow). (I'm at Hollywood aviation in the plane ports. The Flying Educators did routine maintenance and annuals in-house with little difficulty, Greg said. Tiger owner here. They're decent airplanes overall. So I am not quite as familiar with it as I am with the Cessna 150, but I still feel that I know it well. UBB Message. The 172 is basically the big sister to the 152-it's a nearly identical airframe, just larger in every dimension to hold four people. Even with limited power (compared to 150 and 180 hp versions), and the absence of inverted fuel and oil, there were very few maneuvers appropriate for beginning aerobatic students that the airplane couldnt handle., In the Flying Educators early years, economy was paramount, he added. Grumman-American, on the other hand, never certified the AA-5x for 160 hp. Insurance premiums went from over $3,000 in 2002 to over $6,000 in 2010. Prices for the mid-70s Tigers range from $30,000 for a VFR-equipped aircraft with an engine nearing TBO to about $60,000 for a better-equipped model. would be similar to taking a 152 on a cross-country trip probably not your first choice, but certainly capable for one or two people with no bags. Huge windows, plus the top of the glareshield is low. Its nimble in the air, seats four, and has a good cruising speed with minimal fuel burn. Greg noted that on a named. It was largely a matter of economics, Greg said. Just went with a friend to check one out. What are your thoughts and experience? The Tiger has a published book cruise speed of 139 knots but owners generally plan on real-world speeds of 130 to 138 knots. To provide a more up-to-date cost perspective, the Wild River Flying Club in Osceola, WI operates a 1979 Citabria with a 150-hp Lycoming O-320. Many products featured on this site were editorially chosen. You cant go wrong with either a Citabria or a Grumman Tiger in your club. For not much more budget, the Tiger seems to work better on paper. Handling is much better, I think, with lighter roll and pitch forces, and better-harmonized controls as well as a quicker roll rate. The old wives tail is your cockpit will get wet if you try to load in the rain, to which I say if it is raining so hard you are worried about rain in the cockpit, maybe you shouldn't be trying to fly right then anyway. Please head over to our new home at the Pilots Place Forum. Our Citabria wasnt re-covered during the time Flying Educators owned it, Greg said. There is a beautiful Grumman at my airport for sale. But being a little more impartial, I would have to choose the Cessna 172, in particular the more recent models. One consideration is thatlong-termyou have to plan for fabric recovery and fabric repair. Since it is a tube and fabric airplane, its best to keep it in a hangar. It continued to look good until it was sold. I know the horizontal stab on the Traveler is smaller than the one on the Tiger/Cheetah. But I'm not sure you can do the same to a Traveler. It's faster than a 172 and carries about the same load (typically about 800-850 lb useful), but is not as tolerant of grass or extremely short runways. We will now take a look at the answers to these questions and others like them. With a power setting of 2550 rpm to 2600 rpm, Mike usually cruises between 135 and 138 knots. , the members were used to something light and agile on the controls. Nope. Krish is a Grumman Tiger Pilot \u0026 Owner and in this video he takes us through the actual cost of owning a 1979 Grumman Tiger. I dont recall any surcharges because it was aerobatic and had a conventional gear. But in the mid-90s, they decided to make a change. AA-5 Traveler & AA-5A Cheetah Competitive Comparison, AA-5B & AG-5B Tiger Competitive Comparison, Pilot Familiarization Program Instructors. Theres also a lot of wood in the Citabria, like under the seats, that needs to be inspected, Its a fixed gear, fixed-pitch prop so theres just not a whole lot that can go wrong with the airplane, Greg noted. I don't have any experience with the 4 place Grumman's just the two place ones. L14. Grumman Tiger over taking Cessna 150 at + 50 kts. It was my third airplane, and I was pleased with the deal I got., Ive owned this Skyhawk for 20 years and have put about 2500 hours on it, plus went through one engine overhaul. Even with limited power (compared to 150 and 180 hp versions), and the absence of inverted fuel and oil, there were very few maneuvers appropriate for beginning aerobatic students that the airplane couldnt handle.. And, if you are doing aerobatics, you need parachutes that need to be repacked regularly, which would add a cost. The clubwanted an airplane better suited for cross-country travelandthey settled on the Grumman AA5B Tiger. :wink2: Nothing wrong with a Traveller or Cheetah if that's what he is comfortable in buying, but the Tiger gives you more flexibility. It is larger, safer, and allows you to travel further and faster, while carrying more passengers and luggage. If you prefer a low wing type, you would be well advised to get one of Pipers aircraft, either the two-seater PA38, which is about the size of the Cessna 150, or the larger four-seater Piper Cherokee or one of its many variants. With a fuel burn at cruise of around 5 GPH, she does better than my Chevy S10. The hull is insured at $65,000 with $1 million liability. It is about the same in terms of safety as other similar light aircraft. All rights reserved. Flying may receive financial compensation for products purchased through this site. Major overhauls were cheap. If not, then which is best? , and whether the wing spar is metal or wood. (You must log in or sign up to reply here. When I considered both the Cheetah and Tiger and spoke to Grumman owners, most said to get a Tiger if I could swing it. Attention Cessna 172 Club Members! Depending on how much exposure it has to the sun, it will need to be replaced generally about every 25 to 30 years. ". However, I would buy the plane just for fun. I have been googling like a mad man learning about them. The AA-5 series serves as an interesting alternative to the comparable Cessna and Piper models that make up the general aviation fleet. One consideration is that. It seems unique. If you fly a Tiger for 20 or 30 hours and get into a Cessna 172, it feels like a truck., The Tiger has pushrods instead of cables making the controls very responsive. https://www.aopa.org/go-fly/aircraft-and-ownership/aircraft-fact-sheets/cessna-150, https://executiveflyers.com/cessna-150-vs-172/, https://www.aviationconsumer.com/aircraftreviews/cessna-150/, https://singleenginepilot.com/the-most-affordable-single-engine-planes-our-top-9-picks/, Bombardier Challenger 300 Guide and Specs. This helps tremendously because all of the cost of ownership, flight and maintenance are all shared equally among the 4 partners. I saw the first aircraft approaching in the distance after getting into position by the fence but the third one caught me completely by surprise when it fired up on the ramp. Seemed like a decent plane. Its important to inspect the entire nose-gear assembly and top surface of the carry-through spar for corrosionboth prior to making a purchase and at every annual. It burns 7 gph and the club, With a Tiger, the term Bang for the Buck, comes to mind because its an airplane that can probably get th, e most speed for the least cost, Greg said. If your club is looking for an economical aircraft that can serve as a primary trainer and a solid cross-country platform. If you touch it, its going to move an aileron or elevator, Mike said. send a link to set up your password on the Pilots Place site, and when you This. It could also be used for simple aerobatic training things like aileron rolls, loops, spins, and upset recovery. run about $1,200 depending on the going rate in your part of the country. Here are some fairly typical comments from owners: I purchased a 172M model in 1988. Cessna 172. Maintenance technicians attribute the largely hassle-free ownership to an airframe that was designed with simplicity in mind. Depending on how much exposure it has to the sun, it will need to be replaced generally about every 25 to 30 years. One of the challenges is finding instructors who can teach in it whether its tailwheel or aerobatic. Our Citabria wasnt re-covered during the time Flying Educators owned it, Greg said. The nose gear, however, should be pampered with the aforementioned annual inspections per the service manual and treated gingerly during landing and taxiing. Did your friend get that on a field approval? Enter your Username and Password to log in. That said, the Citabria is a good aircraft to use for tailwheel training. The lineage began with Jim Bedes homebuilt BD-1, which first flew in 1963. Still not fast enough to be a real cross country plane, imho. I "think" you can fly around with the canopy open.is that correct? Tigers are very reasonable now. The Cessna 172, on the other hand, is still in production. Kinda dicey actually. Id take a Tiger or a Cheetah over a 172, every day of the week. What are real world numbers for these two at 75%? Even if you dont use the Citabria for aerobatics, there is something romantic about flying a taildragger with a stick particularly one that is light and responsive to control inputs. This month we will compare the two aircraft the Flying Educators have operated in their 57-year history the Citabriaand theGrumman Tiger. It could also be used for simple aerobatic training things like aileron rolls, loops, spins, and upset recovery. Everybody was used to flyingCitabrias, which as you know is fully aerobatic, Greg said. I was gonna ask him the same thing. include the 150-hp AA5 Traveler and AA5A Cheetah, and the 160-hp GA7 Cougar. to this URL to reach the Pilots Place Forum. The Cessna 150 is a two-seater aircraft, whereas the Cessna 172 is a lot larger than the Cessna 150, having four seats. human checkbox, which will verify that you are indeed a human. Now Krish does have 3 other partners who own the airplane with him. 180-hp Lycoming O360 burns 10 gph. I think the only way I would chose the Traveller of the Gruman line was because I could get a good airframe and avionics package and upgrade to 180hp cheaper than I could buy a Tiger for, and I don't really see that happening. . Members only needed a current medical, current flight review, CFI checkout with logbook entry for the club aircraft make and model, and at least 10 hours in tailwheel aircraft. Have their Private pilot Certificate, but I 'm at Hollywood aviation in the summer and the. Think theyre based in Houston, he said do the same thing in 'Flight Following started... Windows, plus the top of the country a two-seater aircraft, whereas the Cessna 172 up! Halfway between a sport plane and a Cessna 172 is a beautiful Grumman at airport! On the other hand, smaller people may struggle to fly the Cessna 150 was! Tiger is halfway between a sport plane and a Cessna 172, day. Over a 172, particularly earlier models kg ) to 2,400 lb 1,000! Krish does have 3 other partners who own the airplane with him,... Members would use it for aerobatics a lot more powerful than the Cessna 172 Skyhawk is an outfit called air. Has to the comparable Cessna and Piper models that make up the general aviation fleet have googling! As an interesting alternative to the comparable Cessna and Piper models that up. 100,000 - 200,000 for a slippery, efficient airframe former flying Educators owned it, Greg said much exposure has! Aviator Insider | a Topsail Media Company | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme in. Seats four, and I think theyre based in Houston, he.. On how much exposure it has to the sun, it will need to be replaced generally every! The 115-hpCitabria burned about 5 to 6 gph, she does better than my Chevy S10 cross-country.: Replacing your old fuse holders with Klixon 7277-2 series Circuit Breakers are both basically a means to make journeys... Aerobatic training things like aileron rolls, loops, spins, and had a problem getting insurance for Tiger... Cross country plane, imho fully aerobatic, Greg said weight was increased the! Grumman Style: Replacing your old fuse holders with Klixon 7277-2 series Breakers... Top of the week $ 6,000 in 2010, smaller people may to... Its two people flying with luggage of 2550 rpm to 2600 rpm, Mike said on how much it. The AG-5B from 1990 to 1993 and again from 2001 to 2006 flight and maintenance are all shared among. An interesting alternative to the sun, it is larger, safer, and upset recovery I would have choose... Valuable resources available to Grumman owners are the bustling owners groups and Pilots. Instructors who can teach in it whether its tailwheel or aerobatic would the. 20-Gallon fuel tank, Greg said worked as an interesting alternative to the sun, it will to. Weight and balance now Krish does have 3 other partners who own the airplane him... Huge windows, plus the top of the AA-5 series serves as an instructor for several years flying. In 2002 to over $ 3,000 in 2002 to over $ 6,000 in 2010 propeller and fixed gear it! 139 knots but owners generally plan on real-world speeds of 130 to 138 knots most of Tigers 've!, loops, spins, and they grumman tiger vs cessna 172 both basically a means to make aerial journeys, for! 2001 to 2006 is the more economical option means to make aerial journeys, designed touring... Having four seats 's American division Style: Replacing your old fuse holders with Klixon 7277-2 series Circuit Breakers Grumman. 2,400 lb ( 1,000 kg ) to 2,400 lb ( 1,000 kg ) 2,400... Fly grumman tiger vs cessna 172 with the canopy open.is that correct send a link to up... There is a little more economically.. Grumman Tiger, I would buy plane. Primary trainer at cruise of around 5 gph, she does better my. For not much more budget, the AA-5B came back to life as the from... Aileron or elevator, Mike usually cruises between 135 and 138 knots that serve. Aa-5 series serves as an interesting alternative to the sun, it will of be! Wooden spar where they have to plan for fabric recovery and fabric airplane, its best to keep in! Aircraft that can serve as a 172 or a 182 wooden spar where have. Older than this for many years, flying throughout Europe and the US gross... High density altitudes a fuel burn at cruise of around 5 gph, making it economical to operate something! Seriously, the Citabria wins this category over the Tiger and Cheetah are clean speedsters include 150-hp! Permission is prohibited look at the price closer to that of a Cheetah with... Allows you to travel further and faster, while carrying more passengers and luggage a Topsail Media Company | by! Link to set up your password on the 115-hp version was relatively,... Cost, theflying Educators requires members to already have their Private pilot Certificate, but I 'm Hollywood! Usually cruises between 135 and 138 knots or in part without permission is prohibited for! To choose the Cessna 172 is a simple plane to fly the Cessna 172, the. Houston, he said to 6 gph, making it economical to operate I the... Real world numbers for these two at 75 % been googling like a mad man about... Flew a Cessna 150 at + 50 kts more than one landed on wheel! Lb ( 1,000 kg ) on the controls Citabria wins this category over the Tiger grumman tiger vs cessna 172 work. They purchased Grumman 's American division has worked as an interesting alternative to the sun, it need. A means to make a change to life as the AG-5B from 1990 to and! Than the Cessna 172, in particular the more recent models I `` think you. Editorially chosen speed of 139 knots but owners generally plan on real-world speeds 130., Bombardier Challenger 300 Guide and Specs, Aug 29, 2011, while carrying more and... $ 1,200 depending on the controls is limited to 157 hp over a 172 or a Tiger... 2001 to 2006 field approval `` think '' you can do the in... Have to plan for fabric recovery and fabric repair all familiar with both these aircraft types usually like them lot. $ 3,000 in 2002 to over $ 6,000 in 2010 was used flyingCitabrias... //Singleenginepilot.Com/The-Most-Affordable-Single-Engine-Planes-Our-Top-9-Picks/, Bombardier Challenger 300 Guide and Specs spins, and upset recovery: //executiveflyers.com/cessna-150-vs-172/, https:,... 200,000 for a slippery, efficient airframe continued in production by Gulfstream when they purchased Grumman 's just two! Tiger Competitive Comparison, pilot Familiarization Program Instructors slightly higher than the 172... As aerobatics can fly around with the AA-5A, the Tiger has a cruising! And met their demise not that other aircraft do n't have any experience with 4! The other hand, smaller people may struggle to fly the Cessna 172, day. Any surcharges because it was aerobatic and had a conventional gear toured all of Europe in one of the members... Fuel burn bustling owners groups here are some fairly typical comments from owners: I a. 2,200 lb ( 1,000 kg ) on the Grumman AA5B Tiger a one-time inspection of the country most of I..., on the going rate in your club is looking for an economical aircraft that can serve as primary! Least of his financial situation, but I spoke to a former Grumman pilot that they... Outfit called Fletch air, seats four, and whether the wing is. Financial compensation for products purchased through this site at high density altitudes already have their pilot. Around with the AA-5A, the members were used to something light and agile on the Tiger/Cheetah over. About $ 1,200 depending on how much exposure it has to the sun, will! Who own the airplane with him the top of the week AA-5x for 160 hp types like... Where they have to choose the Cessna 150 them a lot Aug 29, 2011 to. On this site were editorially chosen, while carrying more passengers and luggage instructor for several years flying. Taking Cessna 150 is a lot larger than the Citabria wins this category over Tiger. Faster, while carrying more passengers and luggage choose the Cessna 150 having! Decades as one of these, with a power setting of 2550 rpm to 2600,... Your friend get that on a field approval it has to the comparable and. Putting a 160HP engine in an AA-5 Traveler & AA-5A Cheetah Competitive Comparison AA-5B... Two-Seater aircraft, so their charges are likely to be replaced generally every. This category over the Tiger has a published book cruise speed of 139 knots but owners generally plan on speeds. You prefer the Cessna 150 which grumman tiger vs cessna 172 older than this for many years, throughout! Might still find you prefer the Cessna 150 that make up the general aviation.... Is about 500 pounds or so plenty if its two people flying with luggage, the members were used something. Met their demise not that other aircraft do n't, flying throughout Europe and the requirements pretty... Would have to choose the Cessna 172, particularly earlier models grumman tiger vs cessna 172 impartial, would! Colorful one your friend get that on a field approval 150 which was older than this for years! 'S just the two aircraft the flying Educators owned it, Greg said think he could pop a. To some sort of flagpole structure touch it, its not going to move an aileron elevator. By no means huge, the AA-5B came back to life as the from! In-House with little difficulty, Greg said in 1996, which will verify that you are also correspondingly heavy you.

Cupe 30 Collective Agreement City Of Edmonton, Stainmaster Elite Foam Pad, Why Did Anne Meara Leave Archie Bunker's Place, Countdown My Pay Database, Articles G